Not these two pipers of the printed word. They cite their "unnamed" sources to stir the fan base and generate reactions. There is one thing they're not telling you, the fan, and I have this from a credible MLB.com source (ahahahaahah you like that don't you?) These guys know nothing more than the casual fan. They are typing these stories to generate either "heat" or interest for their name, their company or their benefit period. They honestly have no clue.
Olney from ESPN and Jon Heyman from Sports Illustrated are two sports writers quickly losing ground of credibility with me lately. I honestly would rather not read someone's jibber-jabber unless they had their little ducks in a row and their sources correctly cited. Instead all we get are the standard unnamed source bologna in place of real writing because they have nothing else to come up with. We should be sick of it, and we don't deserve it.